Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE's decisions

Publication type
Journal article
Authors
Claxton K, Culyer AJ
Date published
2006 Jul 01
Journal
Journal of Medical Ethics
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
373-377
PMID
16816034
Open Access?
Yes
Abstract

A rebuttal is provided to each of the arguments adduced by John Harris, an Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Medical Ethics, in two editorials in the journal in support of the view that National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence's procedures and methods for making recommendations about healthcare procedures for use in the National Health Service in England and Wales are the product of 'wickedness or folly or more likely both', 'ethically illiterate as well as socially divisive', responsible for the 'perversion of science as well as of morality' and are 'contrary to basic morality and contrary to human rights'